Comments on: KEEP DENSE_RANK versus ROW_NUMBER – further details http://www.oramoss.com/blog/2010/03/12/keep-dense_rank-versus-row_number-further-details/ The ranting and raving of Jeff Moss Fri, 29 Oct 2010 09:52:40 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4 By: Blogroll Report 05/03/2010 – 12/03/2010 « Coskan’s Approach to Oracle http://www.oramoss.com/blog/2010/03/12/keep-dense_rank-versus-row_number-further-details/comment-page-1/#comment-253 Blogroll Report 05/03/2010 – 12/03/2010 « Coskan’s Approach to Oracle Fri, 23 Apr 2010 01:08:34 +0000 http://www.oramoss.com/blog/?p=157#comment-253 [...] comparison between KEEP DENSE_ RANK and ROW_NUMBER Jeff Moss-KEEP DENSE_RANK versus ROW_NUMBER – further details Leave a [...] [...] comparison between KEEP DENSE_ RANK and ROW_NUMBER Jeff Moss-KEEP DENSE_RANK versus ROW_NUMBER – further details Leave a [...]

]]> By: oramoss http://www.oramoss.com/blog/2010/03/12/keep-dense_rank-versus-row_number-further-details/comment-page-1/#comment-216 oramoss Mon, 15 Mar 2010 07:26:03 +0000 http://www.oramoss.com/blog/?p=157#comment-216 Absolutely...as always, appropriate use of the technology is always the best way forward. Good to hear from you. Cheers Jeff Absolutely…as always, appropriate use of the technology is always the best way forward.

Good to hear from you.
Cheers
Jeff

]]> By: Laurent Schneider http://www.oramoss.com/blog/2010/03/12/keep-dense_rank-versus-row_number-further-details/comment-page-1/#comment-215 Laurent Schneider Sat, 13 Mar 2010 22:10:36 +0000 http://www.oramoss.com/blog/?p=157#comment-215 I could also note that with a lot of columns, Dense_rank is pretty ugly and error prone... Thanks for the followup, Laurent I could also note that with a lot of columns, Dense_rank is pretty ugly and error prone…

Thanks for the followup,
Laurent

]]>